Confronting Race and Second Wave Feminism

omega
WireTap Magazine
September 18, 2009
0
No votes yet
Your rating: None

This year the Omega Institute held another Women and Power Conference, with the theme of "Communicating Across the Generations." Thanks to a notice at Feministing, I got word that Omega was giving out scholarships to attend and I was one of the lucky recipients. I went in being pretty sure that it was going to be three days of hugging, possible hand-holding and trying to re-energize the second wave feminist movement for every generation of woman. And guess what, readers? I was right.

I don't want to get critical before pointing out that there was a lot to be taken away from the range of influential women that spoke at the conference. Gloria Steinem, Isabel Allende, Liza Donnelly, Sarah Jones, Helen Thomas and the Feministing staff were just a few of the names there.

And they all provided something valuable in a larger conversation about the importance of empowering women, continuing to fight for feminist justice in the U.S. and around the world, and finding ways to support one another through that kind of struggle without attempting to "save one another."

I think Steinem was why so many of the women were there, and I can understand that. But I couldn't help but cringe when she started talking about how race didn't exist and that's been proven by biology. While she isn't wrong, she's ignoring that race has been created through social construction and centuries of oppression.

Steinem also pointed out what I, as a 23-year-old woman of color, had forgotten: to call the second wave feminist movement a white, middle-class movement is unfair because there were women of color and lesbian women involved in that work as well. To call it a "white, middle-class" movement is to ignore and silence the work of those women.

Then I remembered why I thought of the second wave the way I did. I looked around the room. I looked at the majority of speakers. Though Steinem called out the work of women of color and queer women, that was about all that was done. No discussion of the intersections of race and gender. No real mention of LGBT activism and its overlap with feminism.

All the work of women of color and queer women didn't matter enough to actually delve into the work of those communities. Real mentions of racial justice and its intersections with feminism were few and far between. A mere mention was apparently enough. I wonder how many other people felt similarly to me -- a woman in her 50s sat with me at lunch to tell me how upset she was that gay marriage wasn't mentioned once.

A young queer activist compared the conference discussions to a tour of a zoo: "There's the work of woman of color over there and gay activism there. But there's no interaction." They both planned to write a letter to Omega. I'm not sure if it will help.

Nina Jacinto is a freelance blogger living in the Bay Area whose writing focuses on issues of race, gender, and media representation. She's a graduate of Pomona College and loves South Asian diaspora narratives, bargain shopping and the internet.

SparkAction Link: click here to shorten
copy http://sparkaction.org/content/confronting-race-second-wave-feminism
3 Comments

GHD Hair Straightener and CHI Flat Iron are all good choices. Cheap but high-quality chi hair iron is waiting for you.Only about several minutes, your hair will be the style you want.Try to find yourself a unit of cheap GHD Hair Styler or chi ceramic iron. Don't buy a cheap metal straightener if possible.How about your hair today? A good appearance can significantly affect your daily mood, confidence and the working efficiency.If you have a b desire to style your hair, ghd hair iron are a good choice. Hair straighteners have become an essential beauty item for many a female across the world in the last decade.If you want to be an unforgettable beauty,you should style your hair first.CHI Nano Ceramic is such beauty of modern that they can actually be used for almost any sort of hairstyle - from creating dead straight hair to giving your mop a vintage curl that will make heads turn.

January 31 at 01:25am

Mandyv,

Yes, you raise an important point that these conferences are a bit predictable. But I think when we have the opportunity to attend and raise questions for ourselves and audiences, it's still worth attending. I had a chance to hear such famous women speak from a variety of fields who I'll never see in the same room again. Would I have seen Helen Thomas address torture and her years of experience as a journalist at a radical women of color conference? Probably not.

But yea, it can be disheartening to have our low expectations of addressing intersections met when we attend such conferences.

September 21 at 04:17am

I wonder how many other people felt similarly to me

I think most people who feel like you don't bother to attend, which is a part of why the audience is so homogeneous in its privileged-ness, but when there are more fulfilling places to be, we tend to gravitate toward them. I can't tell you how many times I've gone to these kinds of events hoping beyond hope that they will prove my dour expectations to be false--and then I get there and am disappointed. I'm sorry (but not surprised) this event failed to be truly representative of powerful women.

September 20 at 09:53pm