Schooling Bill Gates
Issue: U.S. education reform.Why? Public school system in disrepair will be a major '08 election issue.Action: A critique of current national proposals.
Bill Gates is so well-meaning it hurts. He wants with all his heart to embrace an issue that goes almost unmentioned in politics: education. With his catchy and costly ED in '08 campaign, he's doing his darndest to get candidates to actually care about fixing one of the most broken systems imaginable, our public schools. Gates, who's done a lot of research, wants three changes: rewards for good teachers (through competitive merit pay) a uniform national curriculum, and longer school days and hours. Sounds great on the surface.
Beyond the hype though, those priorities reflect a band-aid mentality. Comparing my time working in the public school system with my own privileged education, I've come to realize that much of public education today is practically designed to keep all but a bright and motivated few lower-income kids from achieving social and economic equality. To really level the playing field, public schools need to move towards a model more like elite schools' (for the purposes of this article, I'm lumping in affluent public schools with private schools.) Following are some truly radical priorities that would change schools from the ground up.
Size it up
Let's start with an issue that makes policy makers blanch because of the money required: class size. Reducing class size means building new classrooms and hiring more teachers. But it's inherently biased to put poorer kids in bigger classes. In regimented classes of over 30 children, the attributes that help students achieve are diligence and obedience (and teachers are more authoritarian).
In smaller classes, where conversation can flow more freely, the qualities that help students achieve are analysis, leadership and questioning. One set of skills puts students in managed mode; the other promotes students into manager mode. I can't emphasize that difference enough.
Since kids from poor and middle-class homes are less likely to have other mentors around -- nannies, tutors, counselors and the like -- the chance to talk with adults and air their opinions is more important for them. But they don't get that chance. When I taught during the NYC subway strike and attendance shrunk, all my formerly rowdy students turned docile. In the more intimate environment, their attitudes towards school and authority were different.
The long and short of it
This kind of individual attention can do more than an extra half hour of classroom time will ever do. Kids are kids, after all -- they tend to lose focus. An hour and a half and two hours of math are virtually equal in terms of what a child can absorb, and everyone who teaches knows that nothing gets done in June. You don't see private schools clamoring for longer years; they have the shortest school calendars around! But those calendars are packed with vital activities -- newspapers, sports teams, theater productions, field days. These are a bonus that encourages kids to come to school and help to build self-esteem and passion, not to mention a nice resume for colleges.
Quality time
Most kids, however, are not so well cared for. They go home each day feeling little connection to the place that's supposed to be shaping them. If activities were better funded, many of them would show up thrilled about their debate or tournament later in the day. And when they join activities, they will often buckle down and study to maintain their chance to shine. Students can't learn without a sense of self and an emotional center. We need to help inspire and invigorate kids as human beings first. It's the best tool for helping to free their minds to learn.

Extracurricular activities also help develop crucial mentee-mentor relationships with faculty and older students. Bringing teachers and students closer together, though, requires a sea-change in the way our country views teachers. At the moment we blast teachers and their unions, while spouting glib maxims about the precious task of educating young minds. Please! How we treat teachers is a reflection of how we view kids, and teachers in the public schools are treated like drudge workers. They have to clock in, are at the mercy of their superiors and often spend more time arranging bulletin boards to reflect bogus standards than brushing up on their grammar, math or French skills.
Each day at the Bronx school where I taught, teachers who forgot to hand in attendance folders were "called-out" on a schoolwide loudspeaker. Meanwhile, administrators worried that I was a "bad" teacher because of my classroom's arrangement -- but when my kids did well on a test, I was suddenly "good." In fact, neither of these things were a reflection of my ability, but these are the kinds of standards politicians advocate to judge educators.
Dollar-dollar bill
That's why professionalizing teaching is not just about money (although it helps, I agree with Bill). Many teachers will take a pay cut to teach at independent schools where they get control over the content they teach, respect from the community and a chance to hone their skills in front of smaller classes. They'd rather embrace concepts like multiplication tables than worry about "classroom management" techniques to bribe, cajole, trick or terrorize students into keeping their mouths shut and passing another standardized test.
Yes, there are bad teachers everywhere, at public, private, parochial schools and universities, just like there are bad coaches, drill sergeants, priests and CEOs. But this insane focus on "rewarding good teachers" and lengthening the school year are both a giant distraction. While we waste our time wringing our hands about a small percentage of educators, we're losing focus on the people who matter, our students. Our kids. Let's start by worrying about their needs: individual attention from adults, a chance to pursue passions and dreams and teachers who are able develop to their highest potential. These ideas are just the tip of the iceberg. You listening, Bill?
For more information about issues related to this article, check these links:
Merit Pay
Underpaid Teachers
New York Times article on Gates initiative
An elementary school teacher's perspective on the Gates ED in '08 plan.
Sarah M. Seltzer is a freelance writer and part-time educator living in New York City.
Anonymous
There are some really amazing ideas out there on this subject which I hope will grow in our consciousnesses. Bell Hooks writes beautifully in Teaching Community and Teaching to Transgress, as does Paolo Freire in Pedagogy of the Oppressed. These authors are creating a theoretical groundwork for a pedagogy in which the classroom is a non-dictatorial place where power is shared by all and knowledge is created rather than deposited in young brains.
don't whack your boss free games online
January 30 at 09:55am
Anonymous
I agree with you, your saying is so good and usful for me. Thanks. Are you also like
ugg boots sale
ugg australia
uggs
It’s a meaningful and interesting topic. Thanks.
December 7 at 04:59pm
Anonymous
Use a Flat Fee MLS service to sell your home. Here are some reasons why!
Why a Flat Fee MLS Listing is better than listing with a 6% Realtor
You get the same MLS listing in the same local MLS for a one-time low Flat Fee instead of 6%.
If you sell your home without a buyer’s agent involved, there is zero commission.
More exposure on hundreds of national MLS websites. Many 6% Realtors limit the exposure to public websites to increase their chances of getting the entire 6% commission.
Suzzane Waltz
mls
May 28 at 04:08pm
Anonymous
Sarah S's article is a smart one that the good-government legions should (should have) read and heeded. All her points are good ones. Still, she neglects a few -- while good teachers mostly would prefer a good learning environment over a few extra dollars, the fact is almost all teachers are underpaid, severely. One certain way to attract and keep good teachers is to pay them as though they were really performing a service of value, like a doctor or the lawyer you need when you're in trouble; even payng teachers a fraction of that kind of salary (lets say $70-80,000 in 2009 dollars)would effect a radical improvement in the teaching corps. But as a free-lance journalist covering the developments post-Katrina in New Orleans public schools, I can confirm that paying teachers adequately is an idea that no one seems to have considered. There are dozens of foundations, non-profits and for-profit education entities criss-crossig the city with their bad ideas and good intentions, but it is for sure that none of them have made the sort of difference that justifies their own superior salaries or all the hoopla they have decorated themselves with in their very well-promoted PR initiatives. And in the rush to an all-charter school paradigm, the thing most absent is public accountability, transparency, or genuine public input from parents, teachers and students. I too pray for the conversion of Bil Gates to the role of champion of actual people instead of rich-guys' ideas. Our soon-to-depart Paul Vallas (our very temporary CEO of the post-Katrina state takeover of the city's public schools, called the Recovery School District) is proof you can't ONLY buy your way out of the sort of trouble that decades of injustice have incubated.
May 15 at 01:32pm
Anonymous
We are now on the verge of something where technology will make a difference," Gates said in an address before the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh, Scotland.
Executive Guide: IPv6: Not if, when: Download this special report
home school diploma | high school diploma
March 27 at 08:28pm
Anonymous
Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates outlined Wednesday a vision of education in which students worldwide use high-speed Internet connections and curriculums that draw on online resources such as Wikipedia to become more globally competitive.
"We are now on the verge of something where technology will make a difference," Gates said in an address before the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh, Scotland.
Executive Guide: IPv6: Not if, when: Download this special report
Advances in hardware, software and connectivity and are enabling a "user-centric" focus for technology, letting people access information over vast distances inexpensively, Gates said.
The address by Gates concluded the two-day Government Leaders Forum, an annual Microsoft-sponsored conference attended by government leaders throughout Europe. The delegates addressed education issues and how Europe can become more competitive through the use of IT.
Regards,
Diploma for Prior Learning
February 16 at 07:42pm
Anonymous
One major concern I have over proposals for merit pay (something teachers certainly deserve!) is that administrators and/or politicians are likely to "fix" the expense problem by creating an expensive and unnecessary bureaucracy to determine which teachers deserve this extra pay. It could be argued that this would both make teachers' salaries more competitive, enabling more interested people to build a career in education, and also be less expensive than an across-the-board pay increase. But it smacks to me of the much publicized health insurance problem, where most of our payments are used to prevent the insurance provider from covering health costs. Great for the bottom line, but certainly not useful for improving the lot of the teachers!
June 30 at 10:47pm
Anonymous
The major problem with Today's Education and Bill Gates efforts and all those that have been advising him, is that the educational focus is being incorrectly directed toward teaching instead of learning; or in other words the teachers are just resources like computers and books and buildings; while it is the learner that does the learning..
A foolish like statement was once made by Lester Maddox, a former Govenor of GA -- the gist of an idea that could make our educational system better. Govenor Maddox spoke about the GA prison system and how it needed to be improved. He said that the prison system could be improved if "we had a better grade of prisoner."
The focus in education should be mainly on the learner not the class size, the teacher, the books or the buildings. We have libraries, we have computers, we have mentors and we have peers and friends,, and parents to help us learn. Learners need to utilize what they have at hand to increase their information base. formation of prolematic situations, and apply their skills to solving problems as they see them either individually or within groups and/or teams for collective problem selection and solving.
Bill Gates did not learn to build his empire in school--he may have used the school but his solutions to a problem that he searched to find and then in his garage he started formulating solutions. We have too many ball rolling Gym teachers and and too many test giver proctors and baby sitters. What we need are better learners. Early on--children need to be encouraged to assemble knowlege and methods for solution of problems they find and that they can search for answers.
We do not need more teachers and smaller classes--we need students that can direct their own learning with a little help and guidance from "teachers," parents and those that develop a new way for the educational institution to redeem itself. Our educational system is is failing and we cannot make it better with "surge" policies.
I wonder how Abraham Lincoln became such a good speech writer? I think he did it mostly by reading everything he could find in the Library and not through a teacher in a small class. I think we ought to be able to see that doing the same thing we have been doing has not worked--isn't time we tried to put the burden of learning where it belongs--on the Learner! myxtplk aka EdB
June 16 at 06:45am
Anonymous
Student originated and implemented activities, using the teacher as a resource or guide rather than The Authority of All Knowing, class size for individualizing interaction rather than the factory model of numbers of units containing umpteen levels of knowledge, extra curricular activities beyond sports, maybe merit pay if it means more than raises for administrators' lackeys, are all worthy goals, but more fundamental is the role, or lack of authentically valued roles for children in our society.
Meaning? Student-ing must be taken seriously, rather than as an activity that takes time from skateboarding, mall cruising, fast food jobs, cars with payments, cell phone and video game obsessions, etc.
We sequester them away from normal adult activities, with no meaningful "this is how adults think and behave" daily-life interactions. We segregate them by ages. We exploit them as a consumer group molded to trivial pursuits and superficial material gains.
This is the way the economic, cultural power elites want it. Don't make waves.
June 15 at 08:20pm
Anonymous
This article is so key! Another underdiscussed aspect of educational policy is how the teachers are teaching - the pedagogy. This is not independent from class size, teacher pay, and length of school years/days, but does go way beyond those aspects. There are some really amazing ideas out there on this subject which I hope will grow in our consciousnesses. Bell Hooks writes beautifully in Teaching Community and Teaching to Transgress, as does Paolo Freire in Pedagogy of the Oppressed. These authors are creating a theoretical groundwork for a pedagogy in which the classroom is a non-dictatorial place where power is shared by all and knowledge is created rather than deposited in young brains. All participants in the classroom are teachers and students at once in their various ways, and the goals are community-oriented rather than calculable and functioning parts of a consumerist economic machine. Changing the values and the purpose of education can happen without oppressive state policy and Bill Gates´s money oriented initiatives. Access to education is very important, but it is only a step forward. Another step forward is what happens in "education". What do you think?
June 15 at 12:36pm






